Subject: Well...
Author:
Posted on: 2014-01-06 14:41:00 UTC

It seems to me that the reason the Tenth Walker usually doesn't work very well (other than hijacking the whole Fellowship in favor of an OC) is that the "Nine Walkers shall be set against the Nine Riders" thing is never addressed in a way that makes any kind of sense. Last night, Neshomeh and I talked about two ways that it could be addressed.

1) "If they send nine against us, we will send ten. If they send eleven, we will send twelve." I will admit that this is not the most elegant solution, but it is one that could work, given more time to deal with Elrond's reasoning and wording. This is the weaker of the two options, and would require the most work to get right.

2) "Arrayed against us are Sauron and his Nine Riders. We will answer with Gandalf/Aragorn and Nine Walkers." Not perfect, but setting Gandalf or Aragorn apart as the leader and answer to Sauron, and the others being answers to the Nine Riders, could be done. I think a case could be made for either of those two, really, but Gandalf is the more likely choice. The way this would fail is if the Tenth Walker was supposed to be the counterpoint to Sauron.

So, that's what I came up with. I think this situation is easier to work with than others, which is probably why it is used so often in badfic. They don't feel they need to work very hard to get their OC in the Fellowship.

-Phobos

Reply Return to messages