Subject: If you wanted to fully settle that "Tommy" is still the real villain...
Author:
Posted on: 2023-07-12 12:49:38 UTC

You nailed it square. Siccing a frigging Basilisk over the resident equivalent of Miss Marple after pretending to let her go? Guy needs to die painfully.

After witnessing his manor get leveled by bombs and his precious Basilisk ripped apart by an A-10's gun run, that is, just to drive it home why they are in hiding from Muggles.

Sort.of-related question: how would a Basilisk's stare affect someone who looked at it through a digital device? A camera's lens and reflections were shown to be already enough to damper the lethality into paralizing only ("petrifying"). Snce a camera-and-screen combination would have the footage recorded as raw digital daya, processered by a computer, and then displayed again, I believe it would actually lose all of its power because it's even less of an indirect view - it's more akin of a drawing of a basilisk at that point.

(That is, excluding the sillyness of having electic devices fizzle out when it is convenient. My persona view is that electonic devices relying on electic signals fizzle out in Hogwarts and the like, but basic objects like electrical torches shouldn't really be affected at all)

Reply Return to messages