For both Sedri and The Trojanhorse.
They are both active on the board and The Trojanhorse especially concerning missions. From what they write I think they have a good enough grasp on the English language as to be able to decide who may write missions.
This list is also available as a Atom/RSS feed
-
*blushes furiously* by
on 2010-01-21 02:07:00 UTC
Reply
Um, thank you all for saying such nice things! If it be the will of the majority I will certainly be a PG ... I suppose I should start pulling my weight around here :)
I also would like to cast votes for both Sedri and IndeMaat, both of whom I find to be extremely useful types and fantastic PPCers
*disappears to continue checking the vast backlog of email she accumulated whilst away*
-
Re: Nice sporking, some nitpicks by
on 2010-01-21 01:07:00 UTC
Reply
Thanks for the nitpicks. No matter how often I reread, there's always something I miss. Concrit is always very welcome.
I think that Car'rok and Tia are more alike than either would want to admit, but if having them respond in too similar a manner doesn't come off very well, I'll keep it in mind.
-
Thanks! (nm) by
on 2010-01-21 01:07:00 UTC
Reply
-
Can I retract the question? by
on 2010-01-20 23:58:00 UTC
Reply
I think I was panicking a bit when I asked that. I logged in to see a huge number of replies to my supposed-to-be-easily-ignorable little post and flailed. I'm all embarrassed now. Can we pretend I never asked? I don't really want to give it up, I just don't want a fuss over the matter.
-
Agreeing with the above (below?) messages. by
on 2010-01-20 21:15:00 UTC
Reply
Definitely vote for both; both good writers, and quick with the encouraging concrit, and they've both been around for quite a while now. (How many votes is a majority? Is there a deadline? Can we do a recount later? Do either of them have sponsors? Will there be mudslinging later?
...Can we have a mud fight, then? Those are fun...)
Way to go, guys! ^_^
-
I vote for both Sedri and Trojanhorse by
on 2010-01-20 15:30:00 UTC
Reply
I may not have been on here long, but I think they both deserve it.
-
My vote is... by
on 2010-01-20 11:28:00 UTC
Reply
I vote for both of them.
-
Give it up? by
on 2010-01-20 10:36:00 UTC
Reply
That's kind of like asking if you can give up membership of the Board. The ability to give permission doesn't mean you're required to, and people won't tell you off for not doing so -- they'll just try and get some more elected.
hS
-
Whole hearted support to both! by
on 2010-01-20 09:08:00 UTC
Reply
Sorry for not being around anymore (life happens...)
As an old PG, if you need any advice or help toss me an e-mail: letohaven@hotmail.com pretty much the only way to get ahold of me now.
Leto
-
Re: LotR Mission Plug! by
on 2010-01-20 07:16:00 UTC
Reply
Nice work!
-
Nice sporking, some nitpicks by
on 2010-01-20 07:13:00 UTC
Reply
Impressive work, and good riddance to a nasty set of Sues. I love the reaction to the crown of many colours.
A couple things :
"“It’s easy for you to saw,” grumbled Tia" may need to have "say" instead of "saw", unless this is a pun.
In "Sweeney Todd screw-up", it's typically treated as just the two words "screw up"
"The owner of the second voice, good-looking boy" probably could use an "a" between the comma after "voice" and "good-looking"
"snuck" (five instances) is technically accepted within most of the United States, but sneaked is preferred, especially in works with an international audience. There are also parts of the US where it'll still get odd looks.
"“Probably”" could use a period at the end.
"But therre’s this other chick, Firalyn," should be "there's".
I think "“What is it?” came a beautiful and musical, but rather surly voice." would have a comma between "surly" and "voice", unless "but rather surly" is a restrictive modifier. If it is restrictive because surly is necessary for identifying the voice, then the comma after musical should be removed. As it is, beautiful and musical don't have a noun to clearly modify.
On the extreme stylistic nitpick side:
You've got someone who's supposed to be leading the narrator to Elwin's room brightly announcing that they've arrived, and then the narrator stating that they've gotten to the door to Elwin's room. If there's reason to clarify that there was no duplicity, this is useful, but if there is, I've missed that reasoning. There's a pretty good opportunity for a joke here based on duplicity -- for example, pointing that the room of a Sue is seldom a good place, but that the addition of a giant centipede, several Orcs, and a trio of mini-balrogs spiced up the scenery -- might get it out of the psuedorobotic tone it falls for a second there.
Likewise, there are a few places where both agents in a scene respond to each with very similar sounding tone, most notably when both say "All right". That's actually very realistic, especially if the Agents have spent much time working together, but it doesn't look great in prose. If you want a theme of individuals who are similar inside despite how different they are physically, this can be a useful subtle trick, but I dunno if that's what you're aiming for.
-
Re: Ah, indeed it does. Thanks for clearing that up :) by
on 2010-01-20 06:18:00 UTC
Reply
If MaxInsanity does Rectified Anonymity and I can't team up then I want to do this fic instead:
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5599618/1/BlueShelledLover
Blue Shelled Lover: Koopa Sex with Littlefoot x Cera style anatomical errors
-
Fair enough by
on 2010-01-20 04:40:00 UTC
Reply
But apparently everything's official now, so I'd rather do it right. Don't worry, it won't take long.
-
SQUEEEEEEEEEEE (nm) by
on 2010-01-20 02:43:00 UTC
Reply
-
I vote for them both because I bloody well can. (nm) by
on 2010-01-20 02:42:00 UTC
Reply
-
That shouldn't be funny... by
on 2010-01-19 23:12:00 UTC
Reply
but it is.
-Snerk-
-
I vote.... by
on 2010-01-19 23:06:00 UTC
Reply
Sedri.
Sedri is, like nearly everyone else has said, the first to go up with concrit for the person applying, and It's good stuff that she points out, too.
Plus, she's a dang good author.
Now, I don't have anything against Trojie, I'm just not that familiar with her writing yet, nor her criticing style..... or, anything, actually. I still have my second vote, mind. XD
-
That makes me feel better, Dann; thank you. (nm) by
on 2010-01-19 22:50:00 UTC
Reply
-
Also, two questions for you, hS? by
on 2010-01-19 22:18:00 UTC
Reply
Just some things I'm not clear on.
Can we give up PG status later if we want to?
And,
Do the two Permission responses I've given hold, or should someone else ratify them? (I'd personally feel better if someone did so anyway, regardless.)
Thanks :)
-
Thank you. by
on 2010-01-19 22:10:00 UTC
Reply
And I haven't a clue, but either way, you know more than I do. Once I recieve the mission, I'll pass it on to you. Cheers :)
-
I'd like to second July's nomination of IndeMaat by
on 2010-01-19 22:09:00 UTC
Reply
By sheer virtue of the number of missions she's written, if nothing else ;) But IndeMaat's been here a lot longer and I and has a lot of respect around here, so I'd vote for her.
Trojie... didn't exactly turn it down, as far as I know - no more than I did - but neither of us really wants the job. As long as there's another Permission Giver active, I'd rather stay out of it myself.
-
Re: Thanks by
on 2010-01-19 22:03:00 UTC
Reply
You're welcome. I appreciate your effort :)