Subject: Hm, but are those mutually exclusive?
Author:
Posted on: 2018-05-03 04:36:00 UTC

I like literally everything about this piece... except that I don't think the interpretations you've got of the Codex Astartes are actually in competition. ^^;

On the one hand, with "a tactical and logistical doctrine," you're talking about what the Codex is.

On the other hand, with "some sort of Space Marine ‘bible’, an absurd text followed to the very letter," you're talking about how it's viewed, and that only by some.

Why not Zoidberg both?

There's always the interpretation of canon that says anything that doesn't make sense is propaganda, too. "Oh, the Codex Astartes, it is so wonderful, oooh, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The
ArtofWar">Sun Tzu eat your heart out!" Yeah, totally not reviews submitted by friends of the author, no sirree. *wonk*

Anyway, to fix it, I think you probably have to look for variations on what the Codex actually is. How it's viewed and used is subjective; the contents shouldn't be. Discrepancies about that would be plotholes. I don't actually know all that much about it, though, so I don't have any specific suggestions. {= (

Or, perhaps, another example entirely. The timeline is FULL of plotholes. Like, remember I told you that, in one of the HH books, Magnus gatecrashes the Golden Throne after the Dropsite Massacre? Another book tried to explain that one: Magnus totally showed up on Terra two years before the Massacre, but the shielding around the Golden Throne and the Hollow Mountain and whatnot is so good that it took two years for the backlash to escape, so that's why Terra in general felt it two years later. (Rings about as true as the Liberty Bell, IMO.) But that's just the biggest thing I can think of offhand, because I'm rather familiar with those events. I'm sure there are others that would suit the purpose.

I am, of course, unduly tickled about Thoth reading Dragonflight on-screen. I look forward to writing conversations following this occurrence. ^_^

~Neshomeh

Reply Return to messages