Subject: I take issue...
Author:
Posted on: 2012-10-04 17:58:00 UTC

... with the logic in that thing you linked to. It appears to run:

Each change of speaker gets a new paragraph > A person is capable of being a speaker > Every new person acting is a change of speaker > Paragraphs should come out of my ears.

The flaw is between the second and third statements. Just because a person /can be/ a speaker doesn't mean they /always are/. For that matter, it doesn't take inanimate objects into account (Jacob whistled. The ball dropped. Jacob whistled a second time).

And... okay, I agree that narrative should be better used, but saying "You have not split your paragraphs according to my rule; to do this, you need to entirely rewrite your story and use six times the words!" goes beyond paragraphing. The author doesn't appear to accept the idea that not everyone has the same style - nor should they! - and that how condensed or expanded events are is a part of this.

... as to your original question: not because they're not long enough, but because they're a) incredibly boring, and b) causally related. A line break is an opportunity to recapture the speaker's attention. Doing so just to tell them the next event in a perfectly ordinary sequence is pointless.

And no, that isn't an excuse to begin every paragraph with a silent "Suddenly---!"

hS

Reply Return to messages