No, you read that right. My Little Pony Vampire Strippers.
http://www.mlparena.com/Forums/viewtopic/t=158644.html
It's been moved to a private server (geez, I wonder WHY) by this point, but there's still 260 PAGES of this stuff.
...I don't think any word in my vocabulary can effectively describe my thoughts on this.
(Thanks goes to /tg/ for finding this first and going absolutely nuts over it. In an angry way.)
( http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/3951726/ )
This list is also available as a Atom/RSS feed
-
My Little Pony Vampire Strippers by
on 2009-03-25 04:37:00 UTC
Reply
-
Oh, I will :D (nm) by
on 2009-03-25 02:47:00 UTC
Reply
-
My vast collection of nature books helps ... by
on 2009-03-25 02:33:00 UTC
Reply
... as does my natural squee reaction. I think That Series erased any chance of my finding any sexual appeal in furries, though. But bad yiff is funny. Did I ever tell anyone here about the constellation porn?
-
Re: Try me. I'm a zoologist furry. by
on 2009-03-25 02:25:00 UTC
Reply
You must love working the Redwall beat, then. ;)
-
Awesome. by
on 2009-03-25 02:20:00 UTC
Reply
Wrapped it up nice and fast. I knew where this story wanted to go from the start, so it didn't take long.
Technically, it's designed to take place at about the time I become viable to ask for permission, according to the history I thought up for the character.
Check it! (If you like.)
http://warrior-joe.livejournal.com/1843.html- Character profile, Ver. 2
http://warrior-joe.livejournal.com/2209.html- The short story, "Monotony".
-
Mix plug! by
on 2009-03-25 01:53:00 UTC
Reply
http://chelonianmobile.deviantart.com/art/twofaced-117014937
I made a fanmix for Molly Rath! Couldn't resist. Didn't mark it Mature even though she's blood-spattered, because the blood isn't the focus of this pic. Tell me if you think it needs to be moved up a rating notch. So, whattya think?
Will have to do more of these.
-
Try me. I'm a zoologist furry. by
on 2009-03-25 01:52:00 UTC
Reply
Well, technically not a zoologist until I start college in October, but close enough. The two don't mix well. No biological science mixes well with furry. "What? That's a CANINE feature, it doesn't go on a Pikachu!"
Hell, biology doesn't mix with fandom of any sort. "It's HOW BIG?! What? Why is that man pregnant?! ARGH!"
-
I'm not ashamed of mine but they're nobody else's business. by
on 2009-03-25 01:48:00 UTC
Reply
Except I will admit to squeeing insanely over furries, but I'm mostly in that for the cute factor. And I admit to being a slasher, but on the internet admitting you're a slasher is pretty much like admitting you walk upright ... well, not really, but like admitting that you do something where not everyone else does it but ninety-nine percent of people do something similar ... dammit, now we have a bad case of Metaphorgotten on our hands.
-
By all means, dive in. by
on 2009-03-25 01:39:00 UTC
Reply
Universal statements like "the only other tech working for DoSAT" are pretty much the only thing I can think of that would make additions impossible.
Anyways, go ahead, dive in. Dann is probably senior tech by now, but he's crazy enough not to notice.
-
Keeping in mind, of course... by
on 2009-03-25 01:31:00 UTC
Reply
That Vonnegut's Author Avatar was meant to convey the story's message, that said Avatar didn't have everything go his way (and was nearly gutted by a deleted character), and that the other characters reacted realistically to him. Mary Suethor usually can't quite pull that off.
-
For even more hilarity... by
on 2009-03-25 01:22:00 UTC
Reply
Use the definition of Mary Sue on the Wiki:
Mary Sue, sometimes shortened simply to Sue, is a pejorative term used to describe a fictional character who plays a major role in the plot and is particularly characterized by overly idealized and hackneyed mannerisms, lacking noteworthy flaws, or having too many, [Araeph's note: having too many flaws makes you a Sue? Wha...?] and primarily functioning as wish-fulfillment fantasies for their authors or readers.
Now, substitute "Sue" for any PPC agent ever written.
Agent Jay Thorntree, sometimes shortened simply to Jay, is:
- a fictional character who plays a major role in the [canon] plot
- is particularly characterized by overly idealized and hackneyed mannerisms
- lacks noteworthy flaws, or has too many
- primarily functions as a wish-fulfillment fantasy for her authors or readers.
*snerk*
Well, I suppose she and Acy fulfilled our wish of killing Sues...
For those of you who are interested, I've posted a brand-new PPC Mary Sue definition on the Wiki. I think it's better than Wikipedia's, anyway. (Not that that's a difficult feat to top.)
-
Re: Our movie list ... by
on 2009-03-25 01:18:00 UTC
Reply
You should record it and transcribe the best ones. I'd say all of them, but that's a bit much work.
Have fun with your RIGHTEOUS SCIENTIFIC RAGE!
-
Well... by
on 2009-03-25 01:11:00 UTC
Reply
What I always considered the defining trait of the Mary Sue is that they're always in the spotlight, and I just don't see that with PPC agents. When they're in HQ, it's essentially original fiction, and when they're in a fic, it's a Rosencranz and Guildenstern style "the spotlight's somewhere else" situation.
-
Seems more like an attack than anything else, taking it out. by
on 2009-03-25 00:57:00 UTC
Reply
Mostly because it's obviously incorrect to anyone who actually reads it. Probably a Suethor making a potshot.
-
Re: Well... by
on 2009-03-25 00:52:00 UTC
Reply
Thanks for the suggestions! I'm going to make good use of that Pandora site, I know it.
Also, I have no intent of making additions to DoSAT impossible (nor any real idea how to go about doing that if I did). We don't have enough techpeople as it is.
By the way. I've been writing a short piece (1500-odd words) to both give myself a better idea of the character and to act as an introduction to him. Just a quick dialogue between Agent Narc and another tech. What I wanted to ask was, can I use Dann as that other tech? Thought I should ask you before jumping right in.
-
Re: Citation needed. Really. by
on 2009-03-25 00:43:00 UTC
Reply
Well, I don't speak for myself here, but I think some people view it as juvenile or bad writing. Writing what is essentially yourself is "too easy".
Ignoring, of course, such fine examples as Kurt Vonnegut, Hermione Granger, and Gonff the Mousethief.
-
Re: Citation needed. Really. by
on 2009-03-25 00:29:00 UTC
Reply
Oh, that's a trend in the Redwall fandom. Authors will create their own Sues and send in Redwall versions of themselves to kill them. These Redwall alter egos are known as Sueslayers. Lycaenion has an in-progress Suebasher fic called 'Arawolf Beechclaw: Sueslayer Extraordinaire'.
I've noticed that, though, how our agents are often self inserts, but I think the difference is that self-insert sues are often overly new-and-improved versions of the author, or what the author imagines him/herself to be or wishes he/she could be. Also, the self-insert usually has the purpose to either seduce a canon character, bash a canon character, or place oneself in something that happened in the canon and have the self-insert influence it in some way (i.e. bashing/seducing canon characters).
Alter egos, fursonas, and suchlike that WE use, on the other hand, usually have no intention of doing any such thing, and are used for a comedic effect to get rid of Sues, bad slash, etc.
I actually don't understand what's wrong with the idea of an author inserting him/herself into a story, though. Kurt Vonnegut did it, and nobody complains about that. What exactly is it we hate so much about self-inserts, besides what I listed above?
-
Re: I saw it when I was eight. Oh, it made me SO angry by
on 2009-03-24 23:59:00 UTC
Reply
Ack, TVTropes. You're meant to --ing warn for links to that --ing site.
-
I'm a slasher ... by
on 2009-03-24 23:48:00 UTC
Reply
... shame is something that happens to other people :P
-
Our movie list ... by
on 2009-03-24 23:47:00 UTC
Reply
The Core (for everyone, but particularly the geochemists/petrologists)
Dante's Peak (for the volcanologists)
Volcano (ditto)
Tremors (for the seismologists and those of us who lean towards biology)
Jurassic Park (for the palaeontologists)
The Day After Tomorrow (our Dept. has a strong research interest in climate change, ocean circulation and glaciology)
Deep Impact (for everyone)
Armageddon (for everyone)
Ten Point Five (for the seismologists)
Journey To The Centre of the Earth (for absolutely everyone)
10,000 BC (for the palaeontologists)
I kinda wish I had a Dictaphone, y'know. People's *comments* are going to be hilarious.
-
The first two are perfectly acceptable ... by
on 2009-03-24 23:43:00 UTC
Reply
... palaeontology-wise (with the exception of the Dodos, but we'll let them slide seeing as they're funny). But the main premise of Ice Age 3 seems ... dodgy.
-
Re: The last Narnia kinkmeme I saw *wasn't* anon ... by
on 2009-03-24 23:36:00 UTC
Reply
Shame? On the Internet? What is this strange concept?
Hah. Some days I think I'm the biggest prude I've ever heard of, since I actually have the gall to be ashamed about my fetishes.
-
Citation needed. Really. by
on 2009-03-24 23:07:00 UTC
Reply
Continuing the trend of whining about the "canon police", an intrepid Wikipedian has taken it upon him or herself to educate the masses about us.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Sue
"The irony implicit in the fact that the "Sueslayers", being self-insertions that dominate the story, are themselves Mary Sues, apparently escapes the awareness of these authors."
lulwhat? Also, since when have we been called "Sueslayers"?
-
Re: Yep, that's me *sniff* by
on 2009-03-24 23:05:00 UTC
Reply
I guess my mind is still just addicted to the idea of a scale-clad menace slinking through the undergrowth.
Ooh, what about locking in climatologists (architects are good, too) with The Day After Tomorrow, or astronomers and physicists with Armageddon?
Oh, Hollywood. You torment our scientific community so.
-
Well, you can just call me Joe. by
on 2009-03-24 22:59:00 UTC
Reply
Ah, the problems you encounter when your Internet history and its associated menagerie of various screennames begins to catch up with you.
DirtyCommie is the oldest, with its origins dating back to when I still played Counter-Strike and my primary 'Net handle was BoSS|Communist. I signed up for the Bioshock Wikia in mid-2007 with it as the handle, not realizing that the same name transferred over to all the other Wikia sites.
Warrior_Joe came about while I was kicking around at Camp ... You Die (a Livejournal crossover RP of frightening proportions and sophistication), though I don't remember precisely where the name itself came from. That was back in late 2007, early 2008.
And as for NovaKrazny... When I first signed up for Gmail last April or so, I decided I'd had enough with keeping track of myriad usernames and elected to begin using one Net handle across various sites. It's pretty much my automatic choice when I sign up for a new site by this point.