Subject: Fascinating!
Author:
Posted on: 2022-11-25 16:05:37 UTC

It always warms my heart, though I'm not sure why, to be reminded that fanworks are not a new invention. People have been making fanworks for as long as we've been making works.

Bit of a tangent, but I'm raising my eyebrow at the authors who compare writing fanfic to theft of physical objects. I'm pretty sure there is a difference between the two. See, if you take someone's car, that prevents the owner from using it. But writing a fanfic does not, in and of itself, prevent an author from continuing to "use" their IP.

There IS a scenario where that could happen: someone writes a fanfic, the author writes their next work using similar ideas, and the fanwriter sues the author for plagiarism. This is why authors avoid reading fanfic even if they don't ban it, so they have plausible deniability if such a case comes up. But, as far as I know, it rarely comes up, and the fear of it assumes the lawyers involved would side with the creator of a derivative work over the creator of the original work. It could happen, I guess, but it seems ridiculous.

I suppose it's also possible that some authors are afraid people will read fanfic instead of buying their books, thus depriving them of revenue. It's even harder to see the logic of that, though. Most people engaging in fanworks have already read the books, and the ones who haven't yet are likely to be inspired to seek them out (unless all the fanworks are total garbage?). Fanworks might be more of a threat to small authors than big franchises, but that assumes, contradictorily, that the small author has a large enough fanbase to pose a threat. With apologies to the authors' egos, that's unlikely.

~Neshomeh

Reply Return to messages