Subject: With certainty.
Author:
Posted on: 2015-06-04 15:46:00 UTC

To allow Baron Phobos to seize the lands of Araeph and Cassie would be a gross violation of the Edict of Bast, and against the very heart of our fair Constitution ((which 'states' that unless someone has been absent from the Board for at least a year, more likely two, I won't be unilaterally shutting their barony down - though politics like Baron Phobos is trying could still leave them without any land, I'm not saying it couldn't happen)). Nor do I deem that he could truly achieve the things he claims - can the master of Cokirt really propose to reinvigorate lands on the far side of the Larninkurvs, countless miles from his present holdings?

On this matter, Barony Huinesoron must stand in firm opposition.

~

And yet, Baron Phobos does make one excellent point. It is a great pity that the newly-appointed barons all took their domains in the western lands; there remain still no active barons east of the Larninkurvs. The wisdom of allowing the Baronial Council to rule directly over the Riding, I therefore come to doubt.

Yet to who else might it be given? What say the knights of Plort - to whom will you entrust the staff of life, and the bread of your campaigns?

((Or, as Ixigrace have already asked: who else could rule it? From an OoU perspective, what's the most appropriate government for 'people writing missions'? I was going with 'Permission Givers', but it doesn't quite work...))

((How about something involving the arts of Beytah (healing magic)? A Conclave of Beytah might work...))

((hS))

Reply Return to messages